Michael Mortensen, Developer & Urban Planner

Michael Mortensen brings 20 years of development and urban planning experience to his work leading teams and managing all aspects of the development of transformative mixed-use projects. A developer and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Planners, Michael understands development from both the private and public perspective. His experience includes projects at scale in Greater Vancouver, Toronto, London UK, and Edinburgh.

www.plan-tlc.comĀ for more information.

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. Micheal

    My name is Jake Fry I own smallworks (www.smallworks.ca) which a company that advocated for and was the initial builders of Laneway homes in Vancouver

    Just read your post on the New vancouver special. Could not agree with these idea more. I taken a few project to city along these idea – none survived.

    I am a chum of Bob Ransford and run a non profit with him Smallhousing BC (www.smallhousing bc.org) – I am sure Bob mentioned this to you. Bob speak very highly of you.

    We discussed the is morning how we could turn your proposal into a great charette to further explore this idea.

    we could get some local people together along with the some city staff (i.e. Pat St Michelle)

    Are you coming back to Vancouver for a visit soon? iF so let us know and we could set something up

    By the way Bob thinks you should be the new head of planning. With ideas like this to increase ground orientated housing stock , you would have my support!

    Like

    Reply

    1. Hi Jake,
      That’s very kind of you! I know of you through your excellent work – your reputation precedes you! Indeed, I do think we have to have a wider city-wide discussion to re-examine all types of housing in Vancouver to see how our neighbourhoods – in urban centres, the old streetcar suburbs and the low density postwar suburbs – can work harder to address affordability and accommodate more houseohlds in the face of Vancouver’s particular challenges. I am currently in London but can find my way back home to Vancouver early in 2016 for a charrette of some kind. Vancouver is rich in examples of innovative development like the type I describe – from Paul Merrick’s fine coach house designs at Cypress and 13th, to the late Art Cowie’s fee simple row houses at Cambie and 33rd. Lets chat some more – you can reach me at m4mortensen@gmail.com

      Cheers
      Michael.

      Like

      Reply

  2. Hi Michael, my name’s Suzanne Ward and I am an interior designer. I just heard your bit on cbc and I love what you’re thinking re. new Vancouver Specials. Looked for a contact me spot on this site, but no luck. So I’ll post here: I would love to talk to you about your idea and where/how you see it taking off.

    Great work, and I think you’re timing is spot on, good luck with it!

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks Suzanne! You can reach me at m4mortensen@gmail.com

      I think the prototypes are out there for all to see in the City, from the fee simple row houses that the late Art Cowie built on Cambie St. near 33rd Ave to the new infill enabled by the RT-10 and RT-11 guidelines. We have such a standard template of regular sized lots – 33 ft, 40 ft, 50 ft – by 120 ft – we should be able to create some stock plans that offer people quality design and that also speed the approval process. This ultimately brings the cost of new housing down – a key reason why the old Vancouver Specials became so common.

      I wanted to chat a bit about public involvement but did not have a lot of time on air. It is important because designs alone are inadequate – we need to have a city-wide conversation on this in the context of other ways of providing more affordable and appropriate housing options at a variety of scales. Not a process as long and protracted as CityPlan was – but something timely that creates a new options for infill across many Vancouver neighborhoods.

      Vancouver will always attract new investment from within Canada and from outside the country. What we need to do is to harness the energy of that capital and energy to create housing that meets current and future social needs. Replicating the 1950s suburbs is not going to help. Sensitive multifamily infill will.

      Cheers
      Michael

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s